When conversations about fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) in healthcare occur, fraud and abuse often receive the most attention. Yet for Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) programs, potential waste is frequently the largest challenge.
Unlike fraud or abuse, waste isn’t typically intentional. It often results from inefficiencies, inconsistent processes, and inaccurate information that accumulates over time. In HCBS programs, one of the most significant contributors to waste begins with the assessment.
Assessments drive eligibility, service authorizations, resource allocation, and care plans; even small inaccuracies can have operational and financial consequences.
Assessment data serves as the foundation for nearly every decision made throughout an HCBS program. When that information is incomplete, inaccurate, or inconsistent, the effects extend far beyond the initial assessment.
HCBS Programs may experience:
Duplicative and over/under-allocation of services and supports
Assessment variability for similar acuity members across care managers
Service authorizations that don’t fully align with member acuity
Less reliable reporting analytics
Individually, these issues may seem manageable. Collectively, they create unnecessary costs and make effective management more difficult.
Most assessment inconsistencies are not caused by negligence; they are a result of complex care conversations.
Care managers balance evolving state requirements, varying member needs, limited time with the member, and different levels of experience. In addition, differences in interviewing techniques, available information, and member engagement can all influence assessment outcomes.
Rather than replacing clinical judgement, HCBS programs should equip care managers with tools that promote consistency, identify discrepancies, and improve assessment data.
Reducing waste starts with improving the consistency and quality of the assessment process.
HCBS programs can strengthen assessment accuracy by implementing solutions that provide a structured, consistent approach while still allowing care managers to apply their clinical judgment. These solutions should enhance consistency, identify potential discrepancies, and deliver real-time suggestions to help reduce variability before it impacts downstream decisions.
When care managers are supported with standardized workflows and immediate feedback, organizations can:
Improve consistency across assessors
Identify discrepancies before assessments are finalized
Reduce rework and administration burden
Increase confidence in assessment data
Strengthen care planning and service authorization
Rather than identifying waste after services have been delivered, programs can address it at the source and create a stronger foundation for effective HCBS program management and higher quality person-centered care.